Friday, March 7, 2008

Check this out.

Check out these babies.






Encouraging, ain't it? But when you look at the actual polls, they give an even further story.

In the Obama matchup:



Look at that. Some things I noticed:

-SUSA gave McCain NJ on the Obama map, even though they tie there. Seems odd considering NJ has been consistently blue for 20 years now.
-TEXAS is competitive, according to the polls. Yeah, I have no idea how that happened. McCain takes it by 1%, making it firmly up in the air.
-McCain also wins Florida and Nebraska by 2 and 3 percent, respectively, making them also effectively swing states.
-Virginia is a tie they gave to Obama. I'm not so sure about that, but VA turning blue is my big hope for this year.

Conclusion: This map, if it holds to November, could contain a much larger Obama victory than it appears to. Obama could get as many as 367 (!) electoral votes, or as few as 246, with 8 states within a 3% range. McCain is favored in 3, Obama in 5. McCain would have to win at least 2 out of his 3 to beat Obama, while Obama simply needs to hold the ones he has on the map.


Now to Clinton:



-Michigan they gave to McCain, even though the vote is tied. I don't know, I have a hard time imagining Hillary losing MI.
-New Mexico, which is firmly in Obama's column, is tied for Hillary, but they gave it to her anyway.
-Washington state is given to McCain on the map, but is within 2 points in the polls. Firmly undecided.
-For all of Hillary's supposed strength in PA, she only wins by 1%. Tossup for sure.
-Tennessee! Wow. Hillary is tied with Big Mac there. That'd be a nice flip if we can swing it.

Conclusion: Hillary's map makes a few more assumptions for both her and McCain. I'd say that matchup is still a tossup, with Hillary favored, in my book at least. She could get as many as 315 or as few as 255, with 4 states within a 3% margin. A much more static matchup.


Overall? First, I think SUSA is being a little irresponsible handing out EVs for states well within the margin of error. A third category would be nice. But secondly, it shows that this election, regardless of who we nominate, is Democrat favored. I think you were as shocked as I was when you saw Texas, Tennessee and Virginia could all be competitive. This is our election to lose. Let's not fuck it up again, eh?

No comments: